At ERC, where I fellowship, preach, and teach, we have a question and answer time once a month where people can submit their questions anonymously and then either Thang Bwee or I answer them. For the questions that I have the privilege of answering I’m posting the answers here for your edification and general discussion. If you think there’s room for correction then you’re more than welcome to do that publicly using the comment feature below this post. I look forward to our interactions.
The Question(s)
Exodus 32:14
14 And the LORD relented from the disaster that he had spoken of bringing on his people.
- What does ‘relented’ mean here?
- Can the Lord repent for something?
The Response(s)
To question 1 …
- The Hebrew word for relented is nacham (naw-kham’), and further meanings of that word include grieve, to be sorry, to pity, console, comfort, rue (regret), and avenge.
- A more accurate rendering of the Hebrew used here in verse 14 would be that God took pity and consoled Moses (and the people) by not bringing the disaster upon them.
- God shows in the Bible that He has real emotions. He has compassion on people’s pain, listens to people’s pleas for help, and his anger and wrath are roused when he sees the suffering of people from others’ deeds.
- So what seems to be happening here is similar in nature to the command God gave to Abraham to sacrifice Isaac. It was never God’s intention to see Isaac killed, but to invoke an act of obedience and to set up yet another Old Testament type of a New Testament truth.
- Likewise, here in Exodus 32, God speaks of disaster and Moses responds with compassion for his people and pleas for them. God accepts Moses plea (an appropriate and obedient response) and takes pity on the people and does not bring the disaster he spoke of.
- The New Testament parallel would be that of the threat of disaster God says is on those who are a stiff-necked people and who do not seek him, living as if he doesn’t exist. We saints plea for them and God spares some. He says there will be disaster for all who sin, yet he doesn’t meter our that disaster on all but in fact gives grace. He ‘relents’ of what he spoke of bringing on the people.
To question 2 …
- Simple answer:
- Num 23:19 God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it?
- 1 Sam. 15:29 And also the Strength [or Glory] of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he [is] not a man, that he should repent.
- When it comes to ‘changes of purpose’ in God’s dealings with man, God helps us by using language that we will understand. This is called anthropomorphism – the representation of God under a human form, or with human attributes and affections. Anthropomorphism is used extensively throughout the Bible.
- Some may say then, that God is being deceptive, saying one thing and then doing another.
- Anthropomorphism is metaphor. Metaphor, analogy, and similes are never intended to be taken to the extreme. For example, in the Bible we see that the Father “makes his sun rise on the just and on the unjust” (Matt.5:45 ESV). Does the sun really rise in the sky? No. The sun neither ‘rises’ nor ‘falls’; rather, it is the Earth that rotates on its axis, which causes the perception of a rising and falling sun. The Bible is not being deceptive for using such language. It should not be taken to the extreme, but, rather, at what it was intended to convey. It is the same with anthropomorphism.
——
What are your thoughts on these answers? Agree? Disagree? A bit of both? Please use the comments section to share what you think.
Blessings,
Martin
